Sunday, October 21, 2012

From Ben Cayetano People

Independent UCLA professor, BrianTaylor, states that rail is effective in very large cities - but BRT is much better for Honolulu. He also said: "This Rail project, I guarantee you, is going to cost substantially more than they're projecting." This well-balanced report should make it very clear to all that Ben's FAST plan is the way to go!  PLEASE SHARE THIS WITH OTHERS!

 "A hurricane was scheduled to hit Tampa during the Republican Convention.
These winds would have been so strong they could actually blow some of
Mitt Romney's money back in the United States."

UCLA Prof. Brian Taylor doesn't have a stake in the battle over Oahu's transit future. However, the transportation policy and planning expert does offer a unique perspective on what would be best for the island's transit needs – the city's proposed $5.3 billion rail project, or a bus rapid transit system.

"When you look at the size of Honolulu (and) you look at the transportation problem they're seeking to solve, BRT is almost certainly a better investment," Taylor said Friday in a telephone interview with KITV4.

 "How High The Moon"   ...   Les Paul & Mary Ford

While the overall number of projected riders appears impressive, Taylor says it's not nearly enough to offset the tremendous capital cost needed to build the system, as well as the additional expenditures required to operate and maintain it.

Taylor said heavy rail is much better suited for large, metropolitan cities like Tokyo, New York and London, which generate extremely large numbers of riders. The professor points to Mexico City as yet another example, where trains 10 cars deep run on 90-second headways with "crush-loads" at almost all hours of the day.

Pub's Side Note: For us living on the Waianae Coast, we would not have to spend so much time to find the special Rail Station (cost billions) in Kapolei. We would get the bus right around the corner, where we always got it. Use your head, Red.